Sunday, January 20, 2013

Answer 9/11

 STILL NO ANSWER TO THE 9/11 INCONSISTENCIES


Police Chiefs Across the US Alerted About 9/11 WTC Demolition Evidence

Motivate Your Local Police Department Today
to Take Action!


Our Action of the Month for January invites you to visit your local police chief and sheriff to follow-up on a letter that we have just faxed to them.  (you can find copy below or go to link provided)

The criminal attacks of 9/11 may not be an isolated event. Because 9/11 was the pretext for the Patriot Act, the indefinite detention provisions of the 2012 NDAA and other policy changes that have affected domestic policing across the country, and because law enforcement officers take an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, we are asking our nation’s police officers to take a closer look at what really happened on 9/11. Read more...

Letter to fax to your sheriff department:

RE: Local Jurisdiction for the crimes of 9/11/01

Dear _________________________,

On September 11, 2001, criminal acts were committed in New York City that killed nearly 3,000 people.  Fire and structural damage from airplane impacts were blamed for the destruction of the Twin Towers, and fire alone was blamed for the destruction of the 47-storey World Trade Center Building 7.  We are writing to request that you take appropriate action given that the independent investigation of 1,700 architects and engineers has concluded that the official explanations for the failure of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7 on 9/11 are fraudulent and that a crime of an even far worse nature has occurred.

Why are we doing this?

I am the founder and CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth).  Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is a nonprofit organization of technical and building professionals who have re-examined the destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rises. There is overwhelming scientific evidence that indicates that the destruction of the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7 was not adequately explained by the official theories outlined in the 2002 FEMA and 2005/2008 NIST reports, and that these three high-rises were brought down with explosives. 

Summary Evidence:

·    ·    World Trade Center Building 7 – which wasn’t hit by an airplane – falling, in under 7 seconds, at free-fall acceleration on the afternoon of 9/11.

·    More than 100 first responders reporting explosions at the Twin Towers and flashes consistent with preset explosives. 

·    The Twin Towers suffering total destruction in 10 to 14 seconds in near free-fall acceleration which can only occur as a result of preset demolition explosives.

·    A massive debris field 1,400 feet in diameter and the presence of several tons of molten metal found in the debris, consistent with the extreme temperatures generated by the use of thermite (an incendiary used to cut through steel).
·    An international team of scientists discovering nano-thermitic composite material in World Trade Center dust samples, providing evidence of the presence of advanced energetic materials. 

·    Wholesale destruction of evidence prior to the completion of the investigation, and the exclusion of significant relevant forensic evidence. 

·    90,000 tons of concrete and metal decking pulverized in mid-air, creating the signature dust clouds of controlled demolitions.

·    Failure by FEMA, NIST, the 9/11 Commission, the Joint Inquiry, the DOJ, and the FBI to follow the national standard for fire and explosion investigation NFPA 921.
Implications of the Evidence:

The evidence includes a comprehensive body of expert testimony.  It is of sufficient caliber to support both law enforcement investigations and judicial grand jury investigations. Our film “9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out” features interviews with several of these experts and may be seen at tinyurl.com/911ExpertsSpeakOut.  This evidence suggests that 9/11 was a crime much different than the crime we were led to believe it was. As well, evidence from the crime scene was omitted, obfuscated, and even destroyed, suggesting a criminal cover up. 

We are calling for a new, fully funded, truly independent and unimpeachable investigation.

We have prepared a web page for law enforcement officials to view at AE911Truth.org/Police-2013.   This information informs you why this crime may fall in your jurisdiction. As well, additional materials will be supplied upon request by writing to police@ae911truth.org


Relevance of 9/11 events today:

Please do not dismiss this letter without reviewing the evidence. The American people have experienced a sweeping loss of liberty over the past decade – based on the official 9/11 story.  The Obama administration has fought vigorously to legalize the U.S. military's right to override constitutional police powers and due process of law by making it legal to secretly arrest and detain Americans without charge and without legal representation.  Such secret arrests are currently legal and the dismantling of our fundamental democratic system of due process, which begins with constitutional police powers, is presently being fought in the courts. Without swift intervention, we may see the end of our right to due process of law in America. All of this is because of an official government story which has been put sharply into question by thousands of distinguished experts and the evidence you will see at AE911Truth.org/Police-2013.

We are asking you to take appropriate action by visiting AE911Truth.org/Police-2013 and by forwarding this evidence through your proper channels. Please also contact me with your professional advice on how to further pursue this criminal matter or email us at police@ae911truth.org and let us know what you think about the 9/11 evidence and our efforts to secure justice.

We require your help in order to achieve an independent, subpoena-empowered investigation that will follow the evidence – wherever it leads.

Sincerely,

Richard Gage, AIA
CEO/Founder
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

No comments:

Post a Comment

DISCLAIMER

This website is provided “as is” without any representations or warranties, express or implied. This author makes no representations or warranties in relation to this website or the information and materials provided on this website.

Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing paragraph,

http://letjesusshowyou.blogspot.com/ (hereafter “this website,” we") does not warrant that:

l This website will be constantly available, or available at all; or

l The information on this website is complete, true, accurate or non-misleading.

Nothing on this website constitutes, or is meant to constitute, advice of any kind. [If you require advice in relation to any [legal, financial or medical] matter you should consult an appropriate professional.]

Limitations of liability

This website will not be liable to you (whether under the law of contact, the law of torts or otherwise) in relation to the contents of, or use of, or otherwise in connection with, this website:

l [To the extent that the website is provided free-of-charge, for any direct loss;]

l For any indirect, special or consequential loss; or

l For any business losses, loss of revenue, income, profits or anticipated savings, loss of contracts or business relationships, loss of reputation or goodwill, or loss or corruption of information or data.

These limitations of liability apply even if we have been expressly advised of the potential loss.

Exceptions

Nothing in this website disclaimer will exclude or limit any warranty implied by law that it would be unlawful to exclude or limit; and nothing in this website disclaimer will exclude or limit http://letjesusshowyou.blogspot.com/ liability in respect of any:

l Death or personal injury caused by http://letjesusshowyou.blogspot.com/ negligence;

l Fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation on the part of; http://letjesusshowyou.blogspot.com/

l Matter which it would be illegal or unlawful for http://letjesusshowyou.blogspot.com/ to exclude or limit, or to attempt or purport to exclude or limit, its liability.

Reasonableness

By using this website, you agree that the exclusions and limitations of liability set out in this website disclaimer are reasonable.

If you do not think they are reasonable, you must not use this website.

Other parties

[You accept that, as a limited liability entity, http://letjesusshowyou.blogspot.com/ has an interest in limiting the personal liability of its officers and employees. You agree that you will not bring any claim personally against http://letjesusshowyou.blogspot.com/ officers or employees in respect of any losses you suffer in connection with the website.]

[Without prejudice to the foregoing paragraph,] you agree that the limitations of warranties and liability set out in this website disclaimer will protect http://letjesusshowyou.blogspot.com/officers, employees, agents, subsidiaries, successors, assigns and sub-contractors as well as http://letjesusshowyou.blogspot.com/.

Unenforceable provisions

If any provision of this website disclaimer is, or is found to be, unenforceable under applicable law, that will not affect the enforceability of the other provisions of this website disclaimer.

This website disclaimer

This website disclaimer is based on a precedent created by template-contracts.co.uk and published by freenetlaw.com